KickUp represents the complete continuum of teacher support. What I love about KickUp is that your core function is what's happening in our classrooms, which is our core function too. You're making sense of it for us in a way that other platforms don't even intend to.
Kate Gauger describes her role at Napa Valley Unified School District as a dream job. She oversees the full arc of teacher development—from brand-new teachers entering the profession through veteran educators in their late careers. When she stepped into this newly created position three years ago, she knew evaluation would be critical to supporting teachers at every stage. What she didn't know was that the digital platform her district used would become the biggest obstacle to building the system she envisioned.
Before KickUp, Napa Valley used a legacy system that Kate describes with a vivid metaphor: a file drawer. You open it up, take out a folder, do a little work in it, put it back, and shut the drawer. That's where it lives. That's where it stays.
The platform digitized what could have been done on paper, but it offered no pathway beyond compliance. When Kate tried to extract insights from evaluation data or customize the platform for Napa Valley's needs, she hit walls. Support tickets disappeared without follow-through. Questions went unanswered for days. The platform treated educator development as a footnote.
Most critically, the system reinforced the exact mindset Kate was trying to shift: that evaluation was a box to check rather than an opportunity for genuine growth. If it's valuable, you don't put it in a drawer and forget about it. You keep it somewhere and return to it, or it has an impact that lasts beyond the evaluation.
When Kate began exploring alternatives to their legacy system and discovered KickUp, something fundamental clicked. It opened up her entire understanding of what it means to create a system for teacher support.
The difference wasn't just features—it was how the components worked together. Evaluation data could drive professional learning. Professional learning created a need to see new practices in action through classroom observations. Those observations fed back into evaluation, creating a continuous cycle of growth.
Three elements stood out:
Kate isn't just implementing a new tool—she's reshaping how Napa Valley thinks about evaluation.
She uses a medical analogy to describe what she's building toward: It's like hearing a diagnosis from a doctor. You could say, 'Oh well, I'll just keep living my life.' Or you could say, 'That's my diagnosis—maybe I should walk 20 minutes a day. Maybe I should tend to that somehow.' And then talk about it in a year's time after working on it.
That shift from accountability to ownership is the goal. When teachers own their growth—when they get the diagnosis and work on it whether they're being evaluated or not—the entire dynamic changes.
KickUp makes that vision tangible. Once evaluations are complete, Kate plans to offer six-week professional learning courses tied directly to evaluation data. Teachers will choose their own courses based on the areas they want to develop. That is ownership. That is exciting—someone being able to do that rather than being told what to attend.
Napa Valley is just beginning to tap into what KickUp can do. The next frontier is the data. With more consistent evaluations this year, Kate will have meaningful insights about what teachers need. She's building her skills in dashboards and reporting so she can extract trends and design targeted support. She's also piloting KickUp's coaching module next year to bring mentorship into the system.
And her role is expanding. The district is writing to the state to become accredited for teacher induction, which means Kate will oversee the full continuum of teacher development—from induction through late career.
For districts using enterprise HR platforms that treat evaluation as an afterthought, Kate's story offers a clear alternative. The shift to KickUp wasn't about one killer feature or a flashy interface—it was about finding a partner who understands that evaluation, professional learning, and classroom observations need to work together as a system.
The implementation itself reinforced that difference. Principals found the platform intuitive and were able to navigate evaluations without constant support requests. Kate has since conducted three principal workshops focused on evaluation—moving quickly beyond technical training to deeper conversations about mindset, values, and the time leaders invest in classrooms.
For Kate, the win isn't just operational efficiency or better data—it's the opportunity to build a culture where teachers own their growth, where evaluation drives meaningful learning, and where the platform supports rather than obstructs that vision.
You can't trust everything you read on the internet.