.png)
District leaders are facing impossible math in 2025-26. A recent McKinsey survey found that 64% of K-12 leaders rank teacher retention as their top priority, while 50% are focused on maintaining critical capital projects—all while working with flat or declining budgets. The question isn't whether to invest in professional learning. It's how to prove which PD programs actually deserve funding when every dollar is under a microscope.
The answer lies in data. Districts that track professional learning engagement, completion, and outcomes can make defensible decisions about where to invest—and where to cut. Here's how PD data transforms budget planning from guesswork into strategy.
Registration numbers tell one story. Completion data tells another. When you can see which PD offerings consistently fill seats versus which ones teachers register for but never attend, you have clear evidence of what's valuable to educators. Low-engagement programs might be poorly timed, irrelevant to teacher needs, or duplicative of other offerings. That data gives you permission to reallocate those funds to initiatives teachers actually want.
Attendance data shows up. Feedback data shows impact. Post-session surveys that ask "Would you recommend this to a colleague?" or "How will this change your practice?" reveal which programs are worth scaling and which ones need retooling—or cutting entirely. When 85% of teachers rate a coaching program as transformative but only 40% find value in a required compliance training, you have budget justification in black and white.
Teacher retention is expensive. Replacing a single teacher costs districts between $9,000 and $21,000, according to the Learning Policy Institute. But which professional learning keeps teachers in your district? Track completion rates alongside retention data to identify the PD programs that might be reducing turnover. New teacher mentorship, instructional coaching, and leadership pathways often show strong correlation with retention—but you need data to prove it to your board.
When superintendents ask which programs to cut, "we think this is valuable" doesn't hold up. "Teachers completed 2,400 hours of literacy PD last year, and our third-grade reading scores improved by 8%" does. Participation data, completion trends, and cost-per-teacher metrics give you the evidence to defend investments that are working—and the cover to eliminate ones that aren't.
The districts navigating budget pressures most successfully aren't the ones spending less on professional learning. They're the ones spending smarter, using data to invest in what works and eliminate what doesn't.
Looking for a platform that gives you the PD data you need? Let’s talk.
Schedule a demo with one of our friendly team members.
.png)