What districts look for in an evaluation system, according to the RFPs

Teacher Evaluation
Instructional Leadership

We read through RFPs from districts and state education agencies to find out what districts are asking for in a teacher and staff evaluation system, and built a free buyer’s guide around it.

If you’ve ever tried to find out which evaluations are still in draft three weeks before a deadline, you know how it goes. Part of the answer is in the evaluation system. The rest is in a principal’s spreadsheet and an email thread you’re about to start.

We read evaluation and educator growth RFPs that districts and state education agencies issued between 2024 and 2026 to see what they actually ask vendors for. We turned what came up most into a free buyer’s guide for HR and district leaders. Here’s the short version.

‍

Three questions to ask any evaluation system vendor

How easy is it for evaluators and staff to use? Principals have to finish the evaluations, staff need to know where they stand, and HR needs to see every cycle without pulling a report by hand. Four questions will get you an answer quickly in any demo:

  • How many tabs, pages, or clicks does it take to complete an observation and finish the form?
  • Can evaluators see an educator’s goals, prior ratings, and past feedback right in the observation?
  • Do staff know their evaluation timeline and next steps without asking someone?
  • How many help tickets does your team field during common due-date windows?

Ask the vendor to show you each one live, with a real form and a due date. A feature list can’t tell you how many clicks something takes.

How well does it fit the way your district runs evaluations? Teachers, administrators, paraprofessionals, and support staff are often on different timelines, rubrics, and state or union requirements. Check that the system handles your framework and district-specific quirks, whether that’s Danielson, a state rubric like South Carolina’s 4.0 or Texas’s T-TESS, or a custom model. Also check that each role can have its own cycle and that more than one evaluator can work on a single cycle.

What happens to an evaluation after it’s submitted? The districts asking the sharpest questions want evaluations and professional learning tied to the same goals. They also want results they can break out by school, role, evaluator, and rubric domain, so they can compare ratings across evaluators and catch scoring drift.

The guide turns all three into a checklist you can bring to vendor demos, plus a short list of questions for your IT and procurement teams.

‍

Who is in this market

Most districts shopping for a new system already know a couple of national names, plus whichever system is common in their state. Here’s where each one comes from and what it was built to do.

Who Provides Evaluation Systems

Most districts evaluating a new system are already familiar with a couple of national names, plus whichever regional or state-specific system is common where they are. Here's a neutral look at where each comes from and what it's built to do.

Frontline Education

Founded
1998
Origin
K-12 admin software
Eval fit
One module in an HR/ops suite

Founded in 1998 as K-12 administrative software (absence management, substitute placement, recruiting). Frontline entered the evaluation market through its 2016 acquisition of Teachscape, a dedicated classroom observation and evaluation tool, folding it into what's now called Frontline Professional Growth. Now owned by Roper Technologies, it offers evaluation as one module within a broad HR- and operations-focused portfolio.

PowerSchool

Founded
Late 1990s
Origin
Student information system
Eval fit
One piece of a larger suite

Founded in the late 1990s as a student information system (SIS), PowerSchool has grown largely through acquisition into one of the largest K-12 software providers in North America. Its evaluation product, Unified Talent Perform, recently added an integration with the Danielson Group's Framework for Teaching, but evaluation is one piece of a much larger suite spanning enrollment, grading, assessment, and special education.

Regional and state-specific systems

Examples
Strive (TX), iObservation (FL)
Origin
Single-state focus
Eval fit
Tight fit to one state's requirements

Past the two national players above, the market is largely regional. Eduphoria's Strive is used almost exclusively in Texas, and iObservation, from Learning Sciences International, is strongest in Florida. These are smaller companies focused on a single state, which usually means a tighter fit to that state's requirements and a smaller team behind the product.

KickUp

Founded
2014
Origin
Built by former educators
Eval fit
Core of a single platform

Founded in 2014 by former educators, KickUp was purpose-built as a single platform spanning the full arc of educator development. Its evaluation tools support every staff role, teachers, administrators, paraprofessionals, and support staff, and connect to the coaching, walkthroughs, and professional learning happening across the district on one shared record. KickUp partners with the Danielson Group but stays framework-agnostic, supporting T-TESS, state rubrics, or a custom model. It supports school systems in 37 states, from small charter networks to some of the largest districts in the country.

‍

If KickUp is already on your shortlist

The second half of the guide goes back through the same three questions from KickUp’s point of view, so you can check KickUp Growth against your own must-haves one at a time. Yes, we’re a bit biased here, but we share with you several resources and words of wisdom from district leaders who have lived this work.

Results

What This Looks Like in Districts Like Yours

The districts below started from different places: a statewide platform being retired, a legacy system that felt disconnected from daily use, hours lost to manual observation notes. Here's where they landed with KickUp Growth.

DistrictStateTeachersHeadline result
Spring Branch ISDTX2,149 10,859 T-TESS summative evaluations recorded; described by staff as "Apple-like"
Read their story →
Stevenson HS District 125IL342 17 simultaneous evaluation cycles; zero training needed for most evaluators
Read their story →
Wisconsin Rapids Public SchoolsWI275 2-hour teacher training; 100% evaluator buy-in; zero implementation issues
Read their story →
Bastrop ISDTX815 6,599 admin hours saved; 3 disconnected platforms consolidated into one
Read their story →
Napa Valley USDCA793 Built one connected system linking evaluation, coaching, and professional learning
Read their story →
Lubbock ISDTX1,781 Observation documentation time cut from 6-8 hours to a fraction with AI Scripting
Read their story →
Baltimore County Public SchoolsMD15,584 Historical evaluation records consolidated per employee in a clean move from PowerSchool Perform
Read their story →

‍

Download the full Teacher and Staff Evaluation Systems Buyer's Guide

Let's get started

Schedule a demo with one of our friendly team members.

Schedule a Demo